Predictably, the slots pay a computer-prescribed return: limited by’luck’of the draw in slot winning or losing cycles. So, bet accordingly! A phrase to the wise: take advantage of the perks, the advice, and find the fairly loose machines; otherwise, you’re a sure loser.
We submit to many generic outcomes: not merely testing our luck on games of chance but another big gamble: the odds no less insurmountable than Casino gambling. Areadomino Oddly, no pun intended, the comparison rests inside our collection of a beneficial, spiritual, safe place, or even to the denial of supernatural existence. Here,’chance depends upon whether we’re born Judaic, Christian, Islamic, or as a doubting Thomas. Yet, like playing the slots, we can evaluate our luck of the draw in this regard also. We only have to discover the paying proposition.
Why compare religious ethos with a questionable ethic like gambling?
If one can accept the diversity in religious customs and their irresponsibility to established rules of engagement, one can wonder at the benefit or outcome in discipline assurances. An interest shrouded in mysterious symbols, numbers, parables, and other unspecific language is not an easy topic to decipher, nevertheless the dilemma isn’t impossible to solve.
The slots are easy to figure: first, we all know they’re computers programmed to go back a certain profit to the Casino; second, we all know they should have winning and losing cycles to encourage bettors and yet assure profit for the house; third, we all know some machines are set to cover a lesser return than others; fourth, every slot winning cycle is followed by way of a losing cycle. Learn to identify the symptoms. Some players typically leave the Casino a winner. Allow you to ultimately quit a winner.
Back once again to another chance so commonly abused:
First, any spiritual belief is strictly in your head;
Second, Daniel clearly limits the monotheism experience to Ten Ages; if one doesn’t know the chronological schedule, then he is subject to much disillusionment and false belief;
Third, Ezekiel advises of a strict limit to benefit, to the kind of Noah, Daniel, and Job;
Fourth, between the statements of Jesus and Paul, a strict limit to time-frame was “at hand” in the Last Age, and was arriving at a close in A.D. 68.
Therefore, because of the factual observations, thinkers must commit to a reevaluation of the monotheism incentive.
If, because of the conclusions, one still really wants to gamble, have a ride on the slots, or chance a religion choice, upon what group of rules or inescapable facts will he select as an edge in these greatly contested gambles? You can’t lose by investigating the syllogistic expressions available nowadays and caused by fifteen years of arduous research.